Legal Opinion
Cascante v. Kakay
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 25, 2011PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*589Mohammed established his prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law in this action where plaintiff was injured when the vehicle in which she was riding, which was operated by defendant Kakay and owned by defendant Chester Cab Corp. (collectively Kakay), collided with Mohammed’s vehicle. Mohammed demonstrated that Kakay’s negligence was the sole proximate cause of the accident by submitting, inter alia, deposition testimony of plaintiff and Mohammed indicating that the accident at issue occurred when, while driving northbound, Kakay drove from the left lane into the right lane,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Zummo v. HolmesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Rivera v. CorbettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
3Cited by9 opinions
- Guerrero v. MillaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Mitchell v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Palau v. PaganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
- Velasquez v. MTA Bus Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Coaker v. MuletAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.