State v. Robinson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Defendants were prosecuted and convicted in the municipal court of Minneapolis on a complaint for violating the city ordinance recited in the opinion, and they appeal from the judgment.
1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.
The ordinance under which the defendants were convicted was assumed to be enacted under the provision of the charter of the city of Minneapolis authorizing the city council “to license and regulate haekmen, draymen, expressmen, and all other persons engaged in carrying passengers, baggage, or freight, and to regulate their charges thereon.” The ordinance provides that “no person or persons shall hire out, keep, or use for hire, upon the streets of the city of Minneapolis, any vehicle of any description or name whatéver, either for the conveyance of passengers, or for the conveying or…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Hunt v. Douglas Lumber Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1933
- State v. DabneySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
- City of Des Moines v. BoltonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
- City of Cheyenne v. O'ConnellWyoming Supreme Court · 1896
- Kellam v. Mayor of NewarkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1910
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.