Legal Opinion

Franklin v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided February 10, 1904No. 2991PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from the District Court of Jefferson. Tried below before Hon. A. T. Watts. Appeal from a conviction of forgery; penalty, two years imprisonment in the penitentiary. Ho statement necessary.

1Opinion of the Court

BBOOKS,. Judge.

Appellant was convitced of forgery, and his punishment fixed at two years confinement in the penitentiary. The charging part of the indictment is as follows: That G. W. Franklin on September, 1903, * * * “did then and there unlawfully and without lawful authority, and with intent to defraud, willfully and fraudulently alter an instrument in writing then and there already in existence and which had heretofore been made by E. V. Hayden, and which at the time it was so made and before it was altered as aforesaid by the said G. W. Franklin, was to the tenor, as follows: ‘Beaumont,,…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Pylant v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API