Legal Opinion

Woel v. Griffith

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 8, 1969No. [No. 237, September Term, 1968.]Published

1Opinion of the CourtMcWilliams, J.

The chancellor, Raine, J., declared the contract between the parties for the sale of realty “to be rescinded and null and void” because it had been entered into on a Sunday; 19 March 1967 to be exact. Oddly enough the contract would have been perfectly valid and enforceable had they postponed its execution until the first day of June, 74 days later. Laws of Maryland (1967), Ch. 196; Code, Art. 27, § 534F (1968 Cum. Supp.). Neither party has appealed from the declaration of nullity. The narrow question thus presented arises out of Judge Raine’s refusal to allow the appellants (the Woels) to…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Spring Co. v. KnowltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  3. Inhabitants of Worcester v. EatonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1814
  4. Thorpe v. CarteCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
  5. Eastern Expanded Metal Co. v. Webb Granite & Construction Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API