Legal Opinion

Hauk v. New York, N. H. & H. Railroad

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 11, 1898PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from trial term, New York county. Action by Clum B. Hank against the New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad Company and another. Prom a judgment for defendants, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtIngraham, J.

Assuming that there was an obligation upon the defendants to use reasonable prudence and care to keep the platform and steps of the depot in such a condition that those who are permitted to use the premises should not he unnecessarily exposed to danger, we think the evidence failed to show that the defendants were negligent in the performance of that obligation. The plaintiff went to the depot of the defendants at New London, Conn., for the purpose of obtaining a meal at the restaurant situated in the depot. He was not a passenger upon the defendants’ road, nor did he intend to become a…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cooley v. Trustees of New York & Brooklyn BridgeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API