Legal Opinion · Dissent

Commonwealth v. HILL

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 28, 1975No. Appeal, 209Published

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion by

Spaeth, J.:

I quite agree with the President Judge, that when the legislature prohibited “. . . selling, [and] trafficking in, any dangerous or narcotic drug,” presumably it meant *581to refer to two different kinds of conduct. That conclusion, however, does not solve the problem put to us by the present case; for if the legislature intended to prohibit not only “selling” but also “trafficking,” why did it not provide a penalty not only for “selling” but also for “trafficking”?

In fact, it did not, as Judge Hoffman points out. I therefore cannot join the President Judge in his…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mollendorf v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1946
  2. State v. LermenyOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  3. People v. GwyerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API