Legal Opinion

State v. Curley

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided December 27, 1916No. A-2190PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error from District Court, Pottawatomie County; Chas. B. Wilson, Jr., Judge. Walter Curley was convicted of forgery, and from an order granting a new trial, the State appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtBrett, J.

In this case Walter Curley, the defendant in error, who was also defendant below, was tried in the district court of Pottawatomie county and convicted of the crime of uttering and passing a forged check. A motion ' for a new trial was filed by the defendant, Curley, and sustained by the court, as stated in the judgment and order setting aside the verdict and granting a new trial:

“Because there was a variance between the proof and the pleadings, in this: the information purported to and did set out a true and correct copy of the purported check which was alleged to have been uttered and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wells v. TerritoryCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1908
  2. State v. NorthrupMontana Supreme Court · 1893
  3. State v. SpencerIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  4. State v. . PadgettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1880

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. SimsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
  2. Boyer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1939
  3. State v. RobinsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1975
  4. State v. WeathersCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1917
  5. State v. JonesUtah Supreme Court · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API