Legal Opinion · Dissent

Artis v. Buffalo, R. & P. Railway Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 14, 1896PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1DissentWard, J.

I am unable to concur with a majority of the court in reversing this judgment and order, and directing a new trial in the case. The plaintiff’s employment with the defendant as a brakeman commenced after dark on the evening of March 28, 1892. While he had been a brakeman upon other railroads, and had experience in their service, he had no knowledge at the time of the accident to him of the -condition of the track upon which he was called to work, or the place where he was at work; and, in performing the service of attempting to couple the cars at the place of his injury, he was obeying the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kuhn v. Delaware, L. & W. RailroadNew York Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Howard v. Beldenville Lumber Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Artis v. Buffalo, Rochester & Pittsburgh Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API