Legal Opinion

Loar v. State

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 22, 1906No. 14,514PublishedCited by 5 opinions

ERROR to the district court for Garfield county: John R. Hanna, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Sedgwick, O. J.

The defendant, John Loar, plaintiff in error here, was convicted in the district court for Garfield county of the crime of statutory rape. He has brought the judgment here for review upon a petition in error.

1. The principal contention is that the evidence is not sufficient to support the verdict. The act itself is testified to by the girl Mary Kramer, and is denied by the defendant. It is insisted that the evidence of the girl is inconsistent with itself, that her testimony is unreliable, and that there are no corroborating circumstances. The record shows that the girl was…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gaines v. WarrickNebraska Supreme Court · 1925
  2. State v. WatkinsNebraska Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Miller v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Sunderman v. WardlawNebraska Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Carmichael v. McKayNebraska Supreme Court · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API