Legal Opinion

City of Rochester v. West

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 7, 1898PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Monroe county court. Robert West was convicted of violating a city ordinance regulating bill-posting in the city of Rochester, and appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.

The defendant, who is the local manager of the Rochester Bill-Posting Company, was upon the 4th day of June, 1897, convicted in the police court of the city of Rochester of a violation of an ordinance of that city relating to bill-posting and bill-boards. This conviction was subsequently affirmed by the county court of Monroe county, and from the judgment of affirmance the defendant brings this appeal.

The ordinance above referred to was adopted by the common council upon the 22d day of December, 1896,' and among its provisions are the following, viz.:

“(1) No person shall carry on the business…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Matter of Application of JacobsNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  2. People v. . BuddNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  3. Cronin v. . People of the State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  4. Lyth v. HingstonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Andrew B. Hendryx Co. v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
  2. Hopkins v. City of RichmondSupreme Court of Virginia · 1915
  3. Eddy v. Village of EllicottvilleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
  4. City of Rochester v. WestAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
  5. Detroit Trust Co. v. AustinMichigan Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API