Insurance Co. v. Morton-Scott-Robertson Co.
Tennessee Supreme Court
FROM DAVIDSON. Appeal in error from Circuit Court of Davidson County. JNO. W. Childress, J.
1Opinion of the CourtMcAlister, J.
This is a suit upon a policy of fire insurance. Verdict and judgment were in favor of plaintiff for the sum of $1,064.32, amount of the policy and interest. The company appealed, and, among other assignments of error, it is urged that there is no evidence to support the verdict. The policy in suit insured the plaintiff against direct loss or damage by fire to their stock of carpets, furniture, etc., contained in their storehouse on Union Street, in the city of Nashville. The aggregate insurance on their stock was $31,000, covered by twenty-three policies, issued by seventeen different…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hamilton v. Liverpool, London & Globe InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Reed v. Washington Fire & Marine InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1885
- Read & Traversy v. State InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
- Mosness v. German-American Insurance Co. of New YorkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- Clement v. British American Assurance Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886
3Cited by9 opinions
- Merrimack Mutual Fire Insurance Co. v. BattsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2001
- Caldwell v. Virginia Fire & Marine InsuranceTennessee Supreme Court · 1911
- Stout v. Phoenix Assurance Co. of LondonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1904
- Green v. American Cotton Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Tennessee · 1901
- Case v. Hanover Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1962
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.