Legal Opinion

Signorelli v. Morice

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided May 6, 1937No. 1713PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OTT, Judge.

On October 9, 1934, plaintiff and defendant entered into the following agreement:

“It is hereby agreed between Julian Morice and Henry Signorelli, the said Julian Morice agrees and binds himself to employ the said Henry Signorelli for a period of one year, beginning -October 1st, 1934 and terminating September 30th, 1935, the'above agreement is binding providing the St.' Martin Winery is still operating, in- the event St. Martin Winery discontinues operations, of its plant, this agreement in full is hereby considered void.
“Julian Morice agrees to pay the. said Henry Signorelli the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Oliver v. Home Service Ice Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1935
  2. Board of Com'rs v. Concordia Abstract & Realty Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1935
  3. Sharp v. McBrideSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1907
  4. Pringle v. Producers' Turpentine Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1910

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fiesta Foods, Inc. v. OgdenLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1963
  2. Brasher v. Chenille, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1971
  3. Derbes v. DallimoreLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API