Legal Opinion

Wirta v. Vergona

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 6, 1957No. Civ. No. 9161PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Dyke, P. J.

Irvin V. Willat, the sole defendant served with process herein, having answered the complaint, moved the court that the place of trial be changed from the county of Humboldt to the county of Los Angeles upon the grounds that thereby the convenience of witnesses and the ends of justice would be promoted. He appeals from an order denying his motion.

By the complaint herein plaintiff alleged as follows: That defendants John Vergoña, Joseph Lombardi and Irvin V. Willat were copartners doing business as the Redwood Lumber Company and that each of them so held himself out to be such partner; that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Maselli v. EH Appleby & Co., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1953
  2. Baird v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  3. Figley v. California Arrow AirlinesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  4. Churchill v. WhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Flanagan v. FlanaganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  2. Lieberman v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  3. Rycz v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API