Legal Opinion

Whitney v. Darrow

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1875PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Marion County, The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court,

Burnett, J.:

This action was to recover five hundred dollars on an undertaking which is as follows: '

*443 “In the Recorder’s Court for the city of Salem, Marion County, State of Oregon:

“ Before James Coffey, Recorder and ex officio Justice of the Peace.

State oe Oregon v.

“An order having been made on the 24th day of March, 1874, by James Coffey, said recorder of the city of Salem in said county and State, that the said Frank Hibler be held to answer upon a charge of arson, upon which he has been duly admitted to bail in the sum of five hundred dollars, we, William Darrow of the county…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Frankel v. SternCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
  2. State v. HaysOregon Supreme Court · 1868

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Malheur County v. CarterOregon Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Kasun v. TodevichMontana Supreme Court · 1924
  3. State ex rel. Mahoney v. McKinnonOregon Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Elsea v. PeppleHancock County Court of Common Pleas · 1912
  5. Nealy v. SextonOhio Supreme Court · 1833

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API