Commonwealth v. Marshall
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Manderino,
The appellant, Eugene Marshall, allegedly shot his estranged wife in full view of several eyewitnesses on December 26, 1967. In August of 1968, prior to trial, he was given a psychiatric examination which was ordered by the trial court. The report of that examination stated that the appellant was competent to stand trial but stated “[i]t is recommended that the subject be seen weekly by a psychiatrist in order to allow him to continue to function well, with the understanding that under prolonged stress, he may in fact, deteriorate and become a quite ill…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Pate v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Commonwealth v. RagoneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Commonwealth ex rel. Hilberry v. MaroneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Commonwealth v. BrunoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
- Commonwealth v. DavisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
3Cited by39 opinions
- Joseph Nara v. Frederick FrankCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- Commonwealth v. SantiagoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Commonwealth v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Commonwealth v. UderraSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Commonwealth v. AppelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.