Legal Opinion

State v. Hemphill

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided September 7, 2005No. 2004AP2829-CRPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEDEMEYER, EJ.

¶ 1. Donavin Hemphill appeals from a judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of possession of a firearm by a felon and possession of a short-barreled shotgun, contrary to Wis. Stat. §§ 941.29(2) and 941.28(2) (2003-04). He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion. Hemphill claims that the admission of a statement made to police who arrived at the crime scene violated his right to confrontation, and that the evidence against him without the admitted statement was insufficient to support the conviction. Because the challenged statement did not violate…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. People v. CorellaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  4. People v. MoscatCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2004
  5. State v. ToliverCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. JensenWisconsin Supreme Court · 2007
  2. State v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2006
  3. State v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2007
  4. State v. JensenWisconsin Supreme Court · 2007
  5. State v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API