Legal Opinion
Stark v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided October 18, 1913No. A-1638PublishedCited by 5 opinions
Error from District Court, Stephens County; Frank M. Bailey„ Judge. Pete Stark was convicted of assault with intent to do bodily harm on an information charging assault with intent to kill, and brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
''"'DOYLE, J.
This appeal is prosecuted from a conviction had 'in the district court of Stephens county. The verdict was guilty of assault with intent to do bodily harm, leaving the punishment to be fixed by the court. The judgment and sentence was rendered November 9, 191], and the punishment assessed at imprisonment in the penitentiary for a year and a day.
The information charged:
“The said Pete Stark, late of Stephens county, and within the jurisdiction of this court, did then and there willfully, unlawfully, feloniously, maliciously, and purposely, and with premeditated malice, make an…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Boykin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1948
- Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1919
- Stuckey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1930
- Wallace v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1925
- Collier v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1931