Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Griffith

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 15, 1823PublishedCited by 3 opinions

This was an indictment for an assault and battery and false imprisonment committed on the body of a negro, named Randolph, in the town of New Bedford. A trial was had upon the general issue, and the allegations in the indictment were proved. The defence set up, and which was also proved, was, that Randolph was a slave, formerly the property of one M‘Carty, of the State of Virginia, who was now deceased ; Randolph having fled from his service in his lifetime.

Read the full summary

This was an indictment for an assault and battery and false imprisonment committed on the body of a negro, named Randolph, in the town of New Bedford. A trial was had upon the general issue, and the allegations in the indictment were proved. The defence set up, and which was also proved, was, that Randolph was a slave, formerly the property of one M‘Carty, of the State of Virginia, who was now deceased ; Randolph having fled from his service in his lifetime. It was in evidence, that Randolph came to New Bedford four or five years ago, and that he had a dwelling-house there, which he had…

1Opinion of the Court

Parker C. J.

delivered the opinion of a majority of the Court, in substance as follows. The first question is, whether the defendant was duly empowered as an agent, to reclaim the slave. We do not decide whether a scrawl is a seal, though probably it would not be so considered in this State.* 1 *19But we think that a letter of attorney was not required, to communicate power to this agent. In general, a seal is not necessary, except to authorize the making of a sealed instrument. A common letter or a parol authority is sufficient for making many important contracts. The words of the statute are,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Duncan v. DuncanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1833
  2. Commonwealth ex rel. Hall v. CookSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1832
  3. Mdill's v. MdillSupreme Court of the United States · 1782
  4. Wright v. DeaconSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1819
  5. Commonwealth ex rel. Hall v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1832

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Department of Homeland Security v. ThuraissigiamSupreme Court of the United States · 2020
  2. Department of Homeland Security v. ThuraissigiamSupreme Court of the United States · 2020
  3. State of Iowa v. Kha Len Richard Price-WilliamsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API