Legal Opinion

Costello v. Panavision of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 22, 2004PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Marylin G. Diamond, J.), entered November 14, 2003, which, to the extent appealed from, denied the motion by Panavision of New York and Pany Rental (the Panavision defendants) for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against them and for conditional indemnification on their cross claim against defendant Universal Television Law and Order, and denied Universal’s cross motion to dismiss so much of the Panavision defendants’ cross claim for contractual indemnification for the costs of defending this action, unanimously modified, on the law, the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dermatossian v. New York City Transit AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Ebanks v. New York City Transit AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Long v. Battery Park City AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Reifsnyder v. Penske Truck Leasing Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API