Legal Opinion

Sustala v. El-Romman

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 21, 1985No. A14-84-657CVPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DRAUGHN, Justice.

Fred B. Sustala, Jr., appeals from a judgment of the 129th District Court dismissing his case against appellee, Nabeel H. El-Romman, for want of prosecution. Appellant alleges the trial court abused its discretion in (1) granting appellee’s motion to dismiss for want of prosecution and (2) denying appellant’s motion for new trial. We find no abuse of discretion and affirm the trial court’s judgment.

On October 16, 1979, appellant filed suit against appellee, a physician, for negligence and battery in rendering health care on October 18, 1977. The record indicates that…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. RotelloTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Veterans' Land Board of Texas v. WilliamsTexas Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Grohn v. MarquardtCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1983
  4. Wm. T. Jarvis Co., Inc. v. Wes-Tex Grain Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1977
  5. Moore v. Armour & Co., Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. Kendrick, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1995
  2. Bard v. Frank B. Hall & Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1989
  3. Waste Water, Inc. v. Alpha Finishing & Developing Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1994
  4. Texas Society, Daughters of the American Revolution, Inc. v. Estate of HubbardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989
  5. Stromberg Carlson Leasing Corp. v. Central Welding Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1988

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API