Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Barros

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided July 28, 1997PublishedCited by 63 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connor, J.

Adriano Barros, Aristides Duarte, James Villaroel and Lamar Johnson were tried together before a jury. The jury convicted them of murder in the first degree and assault and battery by means of a dangerous weapon. They have appealed. Johnson’s appeal was severed from those of his codefendants. In the present appeals, the defendants Barros, Duarte, and Villaroel have raised many issues which we discuss below.2 We affirm the convictions. We decline to exercise our *574extraordinary power under G. L. c. 231, § 33E, to order a new trial or direct the entry of a verdict of a lesser degree of guilt.

We…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. People v. HicksNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Commonwealth v. WrightMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
  5. Commonwealth v. KozecMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BrunoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
  2. Commonwealth v. PikeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
  3. Commonwealth v. SimpsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
  4. Commonwealth v. AndersonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2012
  5. Commonwealth v. LodgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API