Commonwealth v. Barros
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtO’Connor, J.
Adriano Barros, Aristides Duarte, James Villaroel and Lamar Johnson were tried together before a jury. The jury convicted them of murder in the first degree and assault and battery by means of a dangerous weapon. They have appealed. Johnson’s appeal was severed from those of his codefendants. In the present appeals, the defendants Barros, Duarte, and Villaroel have raised many issues which we discuss below.2 We affirm the convictions. We decline to exercise our *574extraordinary power under G. L. c. 231, § 33E, to order a new trial or direct the entry of a verdict of a lesser degree of guilt.
We…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- People v. HicksNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Commonwealth v. WrightMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
- Commonwealth v. KozecMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BrunoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
- Commonwealth v. PikeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
- Commonwealth v. SimpsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
- Commonwealth v. AndersonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2012
- Commonwealth v. LodgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.