Hodges v. Parker
Supreme Court of Vermont
Account. The parties to this action had formerly been partners in the business of purchasing and selling wool, &c., under the name of the “ Wool Co.,” and this action was brought to liquidate and adjust the partnership accounts. Judgment to account was rendered in the county court, and auditors were appointed.
Read the full summary
Account. The parties to this action had formerly been partners in the business of purchasing and selling wool, &c., under the name of the “ Wool Co.,” and this action was brought to liquidate and adjust the partnership accounts. Judgment to account was rendered in the county court, and auditors were appointed. The auditors reported transcripts of the accounts of the parties, and that the transactions stated therein comprised all the business which was done on the joint account of the plaintiffs and defendants; and they found a balance due from the defendants to the plaintiffs of $62,39. The…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Williams, Ch. J.
There are no errors appearing upon the face of the report, which require us to reverse the judgment of the county court in accepting it. If the auditors drew' wrong conclusions from the testimony, or if they mistook in casting interest, it should have been rectified in the county court. But, inasmuch as we cannot resort to the evidence which was had before the auditors, it can-' not be here determined whether any wrong conclusion has been made, or whether any mistakes occurred.
The first exception, to wit, that the accounts have not been…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Rodgers v. . ClementNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
- Dorwin v. SmithSupreme Court of Vermont · 1862
- Jack C. Keir, Inc. v. Robinson & Keir PartnershipSupreme Court of Vermont · 1989
- Atherton v. WhitcombSupreme Court of Vermont · 1894
- Clark v. WardenNebraska Supreme Court · 1880
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.