Legal Opinion
American Spirits Meg. Co. v. Easton
U.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Illnois
Decided January 31, 1903PublishedCited by 5 opinions
On Demurrer to Amended Bill. Sustained.
1Opinion of the Court
KOHDSAAT, District Judge.. The original bill herein was brought against. Easton & Hall. Easton died pending the cause, and an amended bill was filed against his executors and Hall. The amended bill charges that Easton, while a director of the complainant company, was paid a salary, in return for which, with the full knowledge and consent of Hall, his partner, he was to act as complainant’s agent, and from August 22, 1895, to December 3, 1897, did act as agent for complainant, in the purchase for complainant of all corn, grain, and cereals necessary to be and which were purchased and used by…
2Cited by5 opinions
- INVESTORS'GUARANTY CORPORATION v. LuikartCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925
- Young v. Mercantile Trust Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1905
- Allen v. Illinois Mineral Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1939
- Arkadelphia Milling Co. v. BarkerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1913
- INVESTORS'GUARANTY CORPORATION v. LuikartCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925