Commonwealth v. Sexton
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT BY CHIEF JUSTICE MINTON
*188This case requires us to consider whether the courts of Kentucky can undertake a statutorily created judicial review of an administrative agency's final order when the person appealing that final order does not have a concrete injury. Our resolution requires us to apply the doctrine of constitutional standing, and, in doing so, we hold as a matter of first impression that the existence of a plaintiff's standing is a constitutional requirement to prosecute any action in the courts of this Commonwealth, adopting the United States Supreme Court's test…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Airbnb, Inc. v. Hon. Thomas D. WingateKentucky Supreme Court · 2026
- Alan Hummel v. Honorable Gregory M. BartlettKentucky Supreme Court · 2022
- Alan Hummel v. Honorable Gregory M. BartlettKentucky Supreme Court · 2021
- Andy Beshear, in His Official Capacity as Governor of the Commonwealth of Kentucky v. Ridgeway Properties, LLC D/B/A Beans Cafe & BakeryKentucky Supreme Court · 2022
- Anesthesia Health Consultants, LLC v. Kyle J. GoldsmithCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2022
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.