Legal Opinion

State v. Kupsky

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided July 24, 2018No. Appeal No. 2017AP2146-CRPublished

1Per curiam

¶ 1 Ronald Kupsky appeals an amended criminal judgment convicting him of four felonies, including bail jumping, and also an order denying his postconviction motion for a new trial. Kupsky claims his trial counsel provided ineffective assistance on the bail jumping count by failing to obtain a stipulation to prevent the State from introducing evidence identifying the specific charge for which Kupsky was out on bond. We conclude trial counsel did not provide ineffective assistance because Kupsky explicitly directed counsel not to seek such a stipulation. We therefore affirm the judgment of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Old Chief v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. State v. PitschWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
  4. State v. MaloneyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
  5. State v. SwinsonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2003

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API