Legal Opinion

Lantinga v. Lantinga

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 1947No. Calendar No. 43,527PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In this divorce case plaintiff was granted leave to appeal in the nature of mandamus with accompanying certiorari from an order of the trial court setting aside a pro confesso decree of divorce granted to plaintiff and permitting defendant to file an answer and cross bill. The relief sought on this appeal is that this Court order the trial court to vacate the above-mentioned order. Plaintiff asserts that by reason of Court Rule No. 48, § 1 (1945), the trial court was without power to set aside its former decree. The pertinent portion of the rule reads:

"SECTION 1. On proper cause shown, a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Union Trust Co. v. Detroit Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Hughes v. Wayne Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Naylor v. Washtenaw Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Fries v. WonnacottMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Geib v. Kent Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1945

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Allen v. AllenMichigan Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Berg v. BergMichigan Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Baum v. BaumMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
  4. Havens v. Havens-AnthonyMichigan Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Sylvania Savings Bank v. TurnerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API