Bouquet v. Hackensack Water Co.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On appeal from the Supreme Court.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of: the court was delivered by
Parker, J.
Appellant, plaintiff below, claims to be legally aggrieved by the action of the trial judge in directing a verdict in his favor for nominal damages of six cents. '
His case, as finally submitted, was that he owned land on the easterly side of the Hackensack river, a. navigable stream, on which land was a dwelling-house occupied by him and used for the keeping of summer boarders; and that prior to the-summer of 1914 he had many hoarders and did a profitable business, but in that year and thereafter the water in the river in front of his place…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Whitmore v. GilleySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1906
3Cited by4 opinions
- Burgess v. M/V TamanoDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1973
- Bailey v. DriscollNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
- Smedberg v. Moxie Dam Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1952
- WARREN FOUNDRY AND PIPE CORP v. Meriden Stone Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954