Legal Opinion

S. W. Richardson v. Federal Power Commission

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided April 17, 1959No. 17049PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JONES, Circuit Judge.

This is a companion case to the four cases decided today which are styled Sun Oil Company v. Federal Power Commission, 5 Cir., 266 F.2d 222; Humble Oil & Refining Company v. Federal Power Commission, 5 Cir., 266 F.2d 235; Hunt Oil Company v. Federal Power Commission, 5 Cir., 266 F.2d 232; and Magnolia Petroleum Company v. Federal Power Commission, 5 Cir., 266 F.2d 234.

The factual situation is here different from the other cases in that, when Richardson’s filing of the new contract as an initial rate schedule was rejected and his application for a new certificate was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sun Oil Company v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
  2. Hunt Oil Company v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
  3. Magnolia Petroleum Company v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
  4. Humble Oil & Refining Company v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hunt Oil Company v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
  2. Magnolia Petroleum Company v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
  3. Humble Oil & Refining Company v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
  4. Humble Oil & Refining Company v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
  5. Hunt Oil Company v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API