Legal Opinion

Ashton Ferrell v. Dillon Pigue, et al.

District Court, E.D. Arkansas

Decided June 10, 2026No. 3:24-cv-00213Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION ASHTON FERRELL PLAINTIFF v. CASE NO. 3:24-CV-00213-BSM DILLON PIGUE, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER Dillon Pigue’s motion for summary judgment [Doc. No. 13] is granted, and Ashton Ferrell’s claims against Pigue arising under the Fourth Amendment, the Americans with Disabilities Act, and the Rehabilitation Act are dismissed with prejudice. I. BACKGROUND Dillon Pigue, an Arkansas State Trooper, was driving on the highway when Ashton Ferrell drove past him. See Statement of Undisputed Facts (SUMF) ¶¶ 1–2, Doc. No. 14;…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  3. City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API