Legal Opinion
Claim of Hamberg v. Flower City Specialty Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 6, 1922PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Kiley, J.:
The employer is a corporation manufacturing paper boxes in the city of Rochester. Its business is located and carried on in a five-*114story building which it owned. With one other tenant it occupied the whole building. It maintained an elevator for the use of the occupants of said building, which was designated as a combination passenger and freight elevator. On the 18th day of October, 1919, claimant’s intestate, a daughter, fifteen years of age, worked for this company. The place of her work in said building was on the fourth floor. The hours were from seven-thirty a. m. to five p.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Matter of Di Salvio v. . Menihan Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Claim of Gifford v. T. G. Patterson, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Matter of Rendino v. . Continental Can CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Claim of Rendino v. Continental Can Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918
3Cited by4 opinions
- Pacific Employers Insurance v. ChavezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Archambald v. Lake Champlain Pulp & Paper Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
- Ebberman v. Walther & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
- Claim of Laufrouben v. Twelve East Eighty-sixth Street Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929