Legal Opinion

Royce v. Hoening

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 11, 1988No. 87-489PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEUMAN, Justice.

The district court granted summary judgment for defendants in this action for malicious prosecution and abuse of process. On appeal, plaintiff Richard Royce claims the existence of disputed facts making resolution of the controversy by way of summary judgment inappropriate. He also urges this court to abandon the “special injury” rule for proof of damages in a malicious prosecution claim. Finding no merit in plaintiff’s contentions, we affirm.

I. Background. Plaintiff Richard Royce leased a house in Grand Junction, Iowa, to defendants John and Jeanne Hoen-ing. In November 1983,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Brody v. RubySupreme Court of Iowa · 1978
  2. Northrup v. Farmland Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1985
  3. Bickel v. MacKieDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1978
  4. Knapp v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1984
  5. Wetmore v. MellingerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1884

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Berryhill v. HattSupreme Court of Iowa · 1988
  2. Wilson v. HayesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1990
  3. Linda Linn and Mark Shuck v. Pat Montgomery, Christy Schrader, and Brad AllenSupreme Court of Iowa · 2017
  4. Employers Mutual Casualty Co. v. Cedar Rapids Television Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1996
  5. Hanson v. Hancock County Memorial HospitalDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1996

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API