State v. Meyer
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the Court
Defendant Samuel Meyer appeals from an Orange District Court order denying his motion to suppress photographs, negatives and videotapes seized from his home pursuant to a valid search warrant. He contends that, under the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution and Chapter I, Article 11 of the Vermont Constitution, the police are prohibited from conducting a search of a home pursuant to a valid search warrant if the homeowner is not present, absent exigent circumstances. We disagree and affirm.
On February 12, 1996, defendant’s home was searched pursuant to a search…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Wilson v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- State v. GleasonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
- United States v. Salvatore Ross AgrusaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Frank GervatoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
- Charles Edward Payne v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. CrannellSupreme Court of Vermont · 2000
- TBH by and Through Howard v. MeyerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1998
- State v. SchofnerSupreme Court of Vermont · 2002
- State v. MoslavacCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1999
- State v. SchofnerSupreme Court of Vermont · 2002