State v. Buffa
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
Pee Cueiam.
The judgment of conviction of the defendants is affirmed for the reasons stated by the Appellate Division, 51 N. J. Super. 218 (App. Div. 1958), with a qualification to be expressed.
Reference is made in the opinion to defendants’ complaint about certain comments of the prosecutor in his summation to the jury. The conclusion reached was that none of the criticized remarks, including one which was objected to specifically at the trial, was erroneous. They were said to be simply “vigorous and forceful presentation of the State’s ease.” In our judgment, the portions of the summation…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. D'IppolitoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
- State v. BuffaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. LutzNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1979
- State v. BuffaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
- State v. Von AtzingerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1963
- State v. BozeyowskiNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
- State v. TraversNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.