Legal Opinion

Sambunjak v. Board of Review

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 9, 1984No. 47015PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNahra, J.

Claimant-appellee Sam-bunjak requested time off from his supervisor to go hunting. The supervisor told him he only had one day of vacation left, and that was all he could take. Claimant stated that if he caught a deer on Monday, he would be back Tuesday; otherwise he would return on Wednesday, His supervisor told him if he did not return on Tuesday the supervisor would be forced to take action, but did not specify what that action would be. A fellow employee, Matuzak, also asked for the time off, but was told he had no vacation time left and so could not go.

Claimant did not come to work on…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Royer v. Bd. of EducationOhio Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Jacobs v. BenedictOhio Court of Appeals · 1973

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Taulbee v. the Travelers CompaniesOhio Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. In Re WolfeOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. CB Transportation Services, Inc. v. NewmanOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Midwest Terminals of Toledo Internatl., Inc. v. Dir., Ohio Dept. of Job & Family Servs.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API