Ryan v. Lobo de Gonzalez
Supreme Court of Florida
1DissentCantero, J.
I dissent from discharging jurisdiction in this case because I conclude that the district court’s decision conflicts with a decision of this Court, and we should clarify the law. The principal issue is whether the doctrine of equitable estoppel applies where the plaintiff did not know about the cause of action until the statute of limitations expired. The district court held that in such circumstances the doctrine of equitable estoppel does not apply. See Ryan v. Lobo de Gonzalez, 841 So.2d 510 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003). As I explain below, the district court’s decision technically conflicts with…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Quinn v. PhippsSupreme Court of Florida · 1927
- Major League Baseball v. MorsaniSupreme Court of Florida · 2001
- Aldrich v. McCulloch Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
- May v. HolleySupreme Court of Florida · 1952
- Robert Bomba and Annamarie P. Bomba v. W. L. Belvidere, Inc., a General Partner Doing Business as Candlewick Lakes Associates, a PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.