Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Liebke

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 7, 1880PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from the St. Louis Circuit Court, Thayer, J. 18 U. S. Rev. Stats., 183, sect. 17; Smith v. Krauslcopf, 20 N Y. (S. C.) 526. In re Bechet, 12 Nat. Bank. Reg. 201; Miller v. MacKenzie, 13 Nat. Bank. Reg. 496; Beebe v. Pyle, 71 N. Y. 21; Slater v. Jones, L. R. 8 Exchi 186; Bank v. Ryerson, 23 Iowa, 508 ; Galloway v. Snapp, 10 Reporter, 696.

1Opinion of the CourtLewis, P. J.

The plaintiff, for the accommodation of the defendants, and without other consideration, made six promissory notes, payable to the order of the defendants, who indorsed and sold them to certain hanks. The defendants afterwards filed their petition in bankruptcy, and were adjudicated bankrupts on October 8, 1877. A meeting of creditors was called, and on October 26, 1877, a composition was agreed upon under sect. 5103, United States Revised Statutes, which composition was duly approved by the court and ordered to be recorded. The plaintiff was not a party to the composition, and his claim, if…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Stone v. CorbettSupreme Court of Missouri · 1855
  2. Kyle v. BostickSupreme Court of Alabama · 1846
  3. Ellis v. HamSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1848
  4. Dunn v. SparksIndiana Supreme Court · 1849
  5. Lipscomb v. GraceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1870

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lee v. HassettMissouri Court of Appeals · 1890
  2. Thomas v. LiebkeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1884

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API