Legal Opinion

People v. Boswell

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 1994PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

David Friedman, J.

The issue before the court concerns defendant’s right to testify before the Grand Jury pursuant to CPL 190.50. Defendant failed to testify because his attorney was on vacation when her office received notice of the time for him to appear. I conclude that where the District Attorney has met all of his obligations under CPL 190.50 defense counsel’s failure to secure her client’s right to testify does not justify dismissal of the indictment. Moreover, under the circumstances of this case, defense counsel’s failure to act does not constitute ineffective…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. People v. JordanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  2. People v. SturgisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  3. Borrello v. BalbachAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  4. People v. HamlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  5. People v. HunterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. EdwardsNew York Supreme Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API