Legal Opinion

Mark Laster v. City of Kalamazoo

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided November 1, 2017No. 16-2601UnpublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

GRIFFIN, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff Mark Laster alleged in this Title VII retaliation case that defendant City of Kalamazoo punished him for complaints he made to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, but the jury returned a verdict in defendant’s favor. Plaintiff now challenges a number of the district court’s rulings and comments, arguing the district court deprived him of a fair trial and also abused its discretion when it excluded certain proffered evidence. We affirm.

I

Laster argues the district court deprived him of a fair trial by appearing partial to defendant. Because plaintiff…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Mark Laster v. City of KalamazooCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
  2. United States v. Timothy Wayne Morrow (89-5418/5708) and George Mooneyham (89-5710)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
  3. United States v. Darryl Gordon Hickman and Fred McArthur HeadCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979
  4. United States v. WallaceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
  5. United States v. HynesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hanover Am. Ins. Co. v. Tattooed Millionaire Ent'mtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API