Legal Opinion

Fisher v. Royal Crest Country Club Condominium Trust

Massachusetts Superior Court

Decided June 26, 2000No. 995254Published

1Opinion of the CourtGiles, J.

Plaintiffs, Ernest L. Fisher and Doris Fisher (“the Fishers”), owned a condominium unit associated with the Royal Crest Country Club Condominium Trust (“Royal Crest”). A dispute arose between the Fishers and Royal Crest as to whether the Fishers were permitted to keep a pet dog in their unit. The Fishers fried a complaint in the small claims session of the Concord District Court (“the small claims court”) pursuant to G.L.c. 183A1 and received a judgment in their favor against Royal Crest. Subsequently, the Fishers filed this action seeking additional damages based on the same underlying facts…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Kourouvacilis v. General Motors Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  2. Pederson v. Time, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  3. Flesner v. Technical Communications Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  4. Heacock v. HeacockMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988
  5. Highlands Insurance v. Aerovox Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API