Legal Opinion

Mann v. Spangehl

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided February 10, 1916Published

Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, First District. Action by Jesse Mann against Louis W. Spangehl. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. Reversed.

1Opinion of the CourtGa Vegan, J.

The action is to recover the sum of $360, claimed by plaintiff to have been advanced by him at defendant’s request and *236paid by plaintiff to a third party, to whom it is alleged defendant was indebted. The action was tried before a judge without a jury, and the plaintiff and defendant were the only two witnesses called.

According to plaintiff’s version of the testimony he called on defendant and requested him to pay one Rosenfeld, a friend of plaintiff, a sum of money which plaintiff claimed defendant owed Rosenfeld. Thereupon defendant told plaintiff that he was a little short, and that if…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Dormos v. VassilasAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API