Legal Opinion

Ruark v. Tinsley

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 20, 1965No. 21799PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Pringle

On or about April 5, 1965, plaintiff in error, hereinafter referred to as Ruark, applied to the District Court of Fremont County for a writ of habeas corpus requesting removal from the State Penitentiary to the Fremont County Jail while preparing for and awaiting trial on four felony counts.

Ruark contended in his petition that his constitutional rights had been violated because, on the 15th day of January, 1965, the Warden of the penitentiary ordered him confined to an isolation cell without access to his law books, case law notes and typewriter. Prior to the time of his confinement to an…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kostal v. TinsleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1963

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. White v. RicketsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API