Legal Opinion
IN RE RESIDEO TECHNOLOGIES, INC. DERIVATIVE LITIGATION
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided January 9, 2024No. 0:21-cv-01965Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA In re Resideo Technologies, Inc., Case No. 21-cv-1965 (WMW/ECW) Derivative Litigation SECOND AMENDED ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT Plaintiffs, on behalf of themselves and the proposed Company Stockholders,1 seek final approval of settlement against Defendants Resideo Technologies, Inc. (Resideo); Michael G. Nefkens; Joseph D. Ragan, III; Niccolo de Masi; Paul Deninger; Roger Fradin; Jack Lazar; Nina Richardson; Andrew Teichl; and Sharon Weinbar. (Dkt. 42.) On November 7, 2023, the Court issued an Amended…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Mills v. Electric Auto-Lite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Amgen Inc. v. Connecticut Retirement Plans and Trust FundsSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Kamen v. Kemper Financial Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.