Legal Opinion
William Iselin & Co. v. Boardwalk Regency Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 13, 1989No. 87 Civ. 2884(RWS)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Plaintiff William Iselin & Co. Inc. (“Iselin”) has sued defendants Boardwalk Regency Corporation (“BRC”), Desert Palace, Inc. (“DPI”), California Clearing Corp. (“CCC”) (collectively, “the casino defendants”), and Sid Green (“Green”) to recover funds Joseph L. Ruzzi (“Ruzzi”) fraudulently diverted from several corporations he controlled to pay his personal gambling debts. The casino defendants and Green, separately, have moved pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), 9(b), and 11 to dismiss the complaint in its entirety and to recover their costs and…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Goldman v. BeldenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- In Re "Agent Orange" Product Liability LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1984
- Dahlberg v. BeckerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Geltzer v. Artists Marketing Corp. (In Re Cassandra Group)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- McCoy v. GoldbergDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1994
- Miller v. Greenwich Capital Financial Products, Inc. (In Re American Business Financial Services, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2008