Legal Opinion

Campbell v. Campbell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 11, 1991PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the plaintiff wife appeals from so much of an order of the *721Supreme Court, Westchester County (Facelle, J.), entered June 19, 1989, as granted the defendant husband’s cross motion for a bifurcated trial.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, as a matter of discretion, with costs, and the cross motion is denied.

It is well settled that bifurcation is generally disfavored in matrimonial actions, inasmuch as it raises the possibility of economic coercion and may necessitate that two protracted trials be held instead of one…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Klepper v. KlepperAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  2. Wald v. WaldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  3. Fiorella v. FiorellaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  4. Fridman v. FridmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Costin v. CostinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  2. Enker v. EnkerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  3. Silverman v. SilvermanNew York Supreme Court · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API