Legal Opinion

Union Oil Co. of California v. Rainey

Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals

Decided September 18, 1985No. 9-91Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION

Before CHRISTENSEN, JAMESON* and McNICHOLS, Judges. CHRISTENSEN, Judge.

This is a second appeal of this action. In Rainey v. Union Oil Co. of California, 732 F.2d 1563 (Em.App.1984), this court held that direction of the jury verdict against the plaintiffs was error, and reversed and remanded. The regulatory background and factual situation involved in the present appeal are sufficiently indicated in our earlier opinion to render unnecessary their repetition here.1

*706James Q. Rainey and Edwin E. Wampler (plaintiffs) claimed that the defendant Union Oil Company (Union) had…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Byrd v. Blue Ridge Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Aspen Skiing Co. v. Aspen Highlands Skiing Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Coker v. Amoco Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
  5. Angel Urti v. Transport Commercial CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API