Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

In the Interest of M.D., K.T., G.A., E.A. and S.A., Minor Children

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided November 30, 2018No. 18-0947Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

CHRISTENSEN, Justice (concurring in part and dissenting in part).

I agree with the majority's holding that the juvenile court did not abuse its discretion in denying the mother's motion for continuance. I also agree this court should vacate the decision of the court of appeals, reverse the decision of the juvenile court, and remand the case for an expedited hearing. But, I cannot agree to the majority's onerous mandates for juvenile court judges and their effects on court reporters. As a matter of sound judicial administration, incarcerated parents generally should be permitted to participate…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Meier v. SENECAUT IIISupreme Court of Iowa · 2002
  3. In Re Interest of LVNebraska Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Iowa Civil Liberties Union v. CritelliSupreme Court of Iowa · 1976
  5. Bowers v. Polk County Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2002

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API