Legal Opinion
Potler v. MCP Facilities Corp.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided June 8, 1979No. 76-C-854PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BARTELS, District Judge.
Plaintiff, B. Marvin Potler, as trustee in bankruptcy for Underwater Advisors Corporation (“UAE”), brings this diversity action 1 against MCP Facilities Corp. (“MCP”) and Bethlehem Steel Corporation (“Bethlehem”) to recover $81,250 in damages, including expenses and lost profits, allegedly suffered by UAE as a result of its inability to complete an underwater painting job for Bethlehem at Beaumont, Texas. Plaintiff’s claim against MCP, from which UAE purchased the underwater paint called “Steel-mate,” is for breach of warranty arising from the failure of that paint to…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Goldlawr, Inc. v. HeimanSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. SpearinSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Auten v. AutenNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
- Thomas Lonergan v. San Antonio Trust Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1907
- Roto-Lith, Ltd. v. F. P. Bartlett & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1962
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hughes v. Ester C Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 2013
- City of San Antonio v. Forgy, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1989