Legal Opinion

Fitts v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided February 9, 1994No. Docket No. 747-91UnpublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES R. FITTS AND PAULA A. FITTS, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

Fitts v. Commissioner

Docket No. 747-91

United States Tax Court

T.C. Memo 1994-52; 1994 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 51; 67 T.C.M. (CCH) 2136;

February 9, 1994, Filed

Decision will be entered under Rule 155.

James R. Fitts and Paula A. Fitts, pro sese.

For respondent: Douglas S. Polsky.

COLVIN

COLVIN

MEMORANDUM FINDINGS OF FACT AND OPINION

COLVIN, Judge: Respondent determined a deficiency of $ 40,725 in petitioners' Federal income tax for 1986.

After concessions, the sole issue to be decided is whether any part of $…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. United States v. BurkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. James E. Threlkeld v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
  3. Threlkeld v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1986
  4. Paul F. Roemer, Jr. And Marcia E. Roemer v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  5. Metzger v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1987

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Delaney v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
  2. McKay v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1994
  3. Delaney v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1995
  4. Forest v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1995
  5. Delaney v. IRSCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API