People v. Mauro

*551The defendant has raised claims that his right to counsel was denied by reason of the alleged delay in his arraignment, that his station house statement was taken in violation of his right to remain silent and that the hearing court acted improperly in admitting into evidence a tape recording of a telephone conversation between the defendant and his codefendant. However, in view of the fact that the defendant entered a plea of guilty prior to a judicial determination with respect to these claims, he is now foreclosed from raising them on appeal (see, People v Fernandez, 67 NY2d 686; People v…