Legal Opinion

Brown v. City of Fredericktown

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 15, 1994No. 65276PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

GRIMM, Chief Judge.

Plaintiffs brought a quiet title action against the City of Fredericktown. The trial court granted summary judgment for City. We affirm.

In their sole point on appeal, plaintiffs allege the trial court erred in granting summary judgment because equitable estoppel bars City from claiming any interest in the property. They contend that they purchased the property relying on assurances from City employees that City would not claim the property.

I. Background

The facts in the light most favorable to plaintiffs are as follows.

Sometime prior to 1973, Shelby Shrum built a building on…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Farmers' & Laborers' Co-Operative Insurance Ass'n v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1987
  2. Mahaffy v. City of Woodson TerraceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. State Ex Rel. Division of Family Services v. RubleMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Eston v. AmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. McDonald Special Road District v. PickettMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rice v. HuffMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API